Smart citi proyects witihn triangular trade.

To keep life simple, I am treating Hong Kong as a distinct source of China’s surplus; in reality, it captures a fraction—about $75 billion I think—of China’s surplus to the United States and a portion of China’s exports to the emerging world

This isn’t hard to understand—it maps to the swing in China’s overall deficit in commodities (“primary” products in the Chinese data).

The basic tendency since 2016 has been for both a bigger surplus with the United States and Europe (really with the United States now) and a bigger deficit with the electronics supply chain.

And the surplus with the United States is growing fast too. Trump’s stimulus, and the euro area’s absence of stimulus, has led to a divergence between China’s balance with the United States and the euro area (I used the U.S. and euro area data here, and added in trade with HK.)

Israel Balancing US-China Relations: Geostrategic Context

Provide key policy recommendations to Washington on how best to engage Jerusalem strategically in managing China’s rising presence in the Middle East.

The United States can work with Israel to de-conflict, shape, and advance a mutually agreed-upon agenda on China and help Israel build its knowledge base and understanding of China.

Engagement between Washington and Jerusalem should include China as a regular item in discussions and policy decisions. Israel and the United States also should ensure regular information-sharing and joint monitoring of the nature and extent of Chinese investments and economic activities in Israel and in the broader Middle East.

Trans-Pacific View author Mercy Kuo regularly engages subject-matter experts, policy practitioners, and strategic thinkers across the globe for their diverse insights into U.S. Asia policy. This conversation with Alexander B. Pevzner – Founding Director of the Chinese Media Center (CMC) at the College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon LeZion, Israel.”

Finally, despite rapidly evolving relations with China, Israeli understanding of the country and its foreign and economic policies is limited. Washington can help Israel develop its China expertise, learning from its own experience starting in the 1970s.

he notion of Jewish domination of slaving was embraced by, among others, David Duke, who has promoted it on Twitter and on his website, and by the City College of New York professor Leonard Jeffries, whose 1991 speech echoing the claim of Jewish domination provoked a public controversy that led to his ouster as chair of the college’s black studies department. (A federal judge later reinstated him.) 

Soon after, Martin published a book entitled The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches from the Wellesley Battlefront. Although the book was condemned by Wellesley’s president and many of Martin’s colleagues, Martin remained on the faculty until his retirement in 2007.

The U.S.-China-Israel Technology Triangle

Since the 1980s, Israel has carefully walked the U.S.-China technology tensions tightrope, trying to balance its commercial and security interests with the two great powers. The growing dual-use nature of technology threatens to overthrow Israel’s careful efforts to expand trade with Beijing, while avoiding the sales of security technologies that would increase Chinese military capabilities and anger Washington. With mounting political pressure from its American allies and promising Chinese trade prospects, Israel is caught between its two largest and technology-hungry trade partners.


In Sylodium’s system as in a chain link game, bilateral trade is transferred to triangular trade and from this to circuits business that are interwoven with other circuits generating new business opportunities

You can create your own circuit, or route inside Sylodium’s system as China – Africa AI CYBERNETICS, SHENZHEN – Singapore - SADC Shipping Business, SHANGHAI – Dubai - IGAD trade routes, Ningbo –Nairobi – Cape Town - West Africa Shipping global, China South – Middle West - Kenya Shipping 4.0, China – India - IGAD coordinated routes 4.0 

IoTT (internet of things and thoughts)

The more our words hurt, the further we are from freedom, our own will, and our health.

To get a nail removed, it hurts.

The more we grow by economic success or professional prestige, to achieve the desired love, etc., further away we are from freedom, our own will, and health.

The greatest success is peace in the soul, by battlefield.

move from the Sierra de los Picos to The Silhouette of the Mountains

ask to gradually transform reality according to your dreams, increasingly realistic.


There are immutable parts like Earth with respect to man, or the left fist in front of the sand. And mobile or expired totalities, such as rusty iron, or miseries of the soul.

There are pieces of tissue of a body that embrace other bodies and become extinct like fire, and other parts, of the same body, that ram and go away, or disregard the same forces, and tense and harden with sad reluctance, or some fatigue

There are windshields that disrupt the head of the clueless, and the trees or atoms that do not know, or cannot, just now, look sideways.

There is a wind that creeps and sneaks into the atoms and moves the tissue of electrons, skins and forests.

Freedom (the possible one) resides in Will.

If one is of brave Will, or has a deep faith, he will not care so much for losing, or giving talk, or not pleasing, or closing the doors etc.

By understanding (knowing from our own experience) that Faith feeds strength, justice, prudence, and temperance, we would change the other two theological virtues, Hope and Charity, for Love (to the neighbor, that is, to the next, not to every pichichi dog or worms) since Faith encompasses and sustains hope, and charity is a word already very spent over the years (centuries), as much as they are spending in such a short time, the word solidarity, which instead of the agreement of a few in company, in groups, in armies, in front of third parties, it is solidarity of mouthpiece or trumpet.

OBOR ‘Smart City’ Projects

Huawei’s overseas ventures in both underwater fiber optics and 5G have been in part driven by China’s national policy of OBOR.

Huawei executives have continually made it clear their intentions to capitalize on the Chinese regime’s flagship project. While speaking at the annual World Internet Conference in China in December 2015, Richard Yu, CEO of Huawei’s customer service division, Consumer Business Group, announced that Huawei would embark on its own “One Belt, One Road” initiative: a plan to reach out to untapped markets around the world.

‘Smart City’ Projects

OBOR also involves exporting another of China’s technological advances: the “smart city.”

China’s State Information Center published a research paper in December 2015, detailing how the construction of smart cities could help lead the OBOR initiative. 

“While the smart cities of the future could be better, more efficient cities, they could also provide authoritarian regimes with previously undreamt of tools of surveillance and control,” the foundation warned. Additionally, when used in democratic countries, Huawei equipment may “act as a conduit for [Beijing’s] intelligence gathering.”

An example of Huawei’s “smart cities” is at Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, under the OBOR initiative, according to a 2017 article published by Huawei on its official WeChat social-media account.


Other news from Reasonable technologies